VARIOUS & SUNDRY 16

(202109094) Commented on the article:

"How America’s Big Science Literacy Mistake Is Coming Back To Haunt Us"
https://www.patreon.com/posts/how-americas-big-55945976

Just some food for thought for anyone interested:

USA & China start an economic war! Later the war (clearly!) starts going bad for China side!
But, suddenly a new flu-like virus appears (right where Chinese virus research lab is located!)
& somehow China quickly/successfully able to contain the virus (suspiciously looking like they already knew all about it!)!

But, somehow the virus escapes to the rest of the whole world (but not to rest of China!)!

& somehow, USA & all its allies get a massive economic damage, but China gets a massive economic benefit!

(By the way, let's not forget that giving the enemy a disease is actually a well-known old war tactic/trick!)

& China claims innocence (& even (outrageously!) blames USA for the virus!) but somehow prevents all research attempts to uncover origin of the virus!
(Are we supposed to believe China maybe just trying protect some extremely valuable secret tech or something?)

By the way, IMHO, the virus does not need to be engineered at all!
Isn't it possible, for example, China just searched & selected a suitable natural virus & "taught/trained" the virus how to infect humans?

(It is also still possible the virus just escaped from the research lab thru neglect but that still would make China responsible/guilty though!)

(I for 1, at least, conclude that China is clearly guilty & owes compensation to all countries endured damages/losses because of the virus!)

(202109116) I had read that famous physicist Richard Feynman had said that he was getting/picking-up women by essentially treating them as worthless!
I had also noticed that beautiful women prefer to date w/ men who see/treat them as worthless!
(& they seem to think that men who see/treat them as worthy are (desperate) losers!)
What really surprising to me is that many/most(?) of those women also seem to want/prefer a long term relationship!
But here is the problem:
Is it really logical to think/expect that a man who see you worthless (in other words "easily replaceable"!) would really want a long term relationship w/ you?
& even if, a relationship w/ such a man seems to be going long/OK, isn't it very/most likely that is only because he did not find your (equal or better) replacement yet or he is already cheating on you w/ someone else?

(202109142) Here is an analogy which IMHO could explain what is the problem w/ trying to unite (Quantum & Relativity) physics, by simply creating/using a more general mathematical structure:

Imagine that, back in 19th Century, if someone converted all equations of Newton Physics & Maxwell EM Theory into polynomial (curve) equations & claimed uniting all known physics into a/the TOE!
(By the way, it is important to realize that, whether or not if such conversion canbe really done is besides the point!
For example, another analogy could be, if someone converted all equations of Newton Physics into differential equations & added them together w/ Maxwell equations (which are already differential equations) & claimed uniting all known physics into a/the TOE!)

Now imagine the opposite situation, where 2 main theories of physics remain in completely different mathematical forms, but made to really/actually united!
Imagine that, back in 19th Century, if whole humanity was living underwater!
& there were 2 main theories of physics created:
1: Navier-Stokes Physics (which described macro-scale dynamics)
2: Statistical Mechanics (which described micro-scale dynamics)
Imagine that, if those 2 theories were generally thought to be completely different/incompatible!
(Because one was continuous/deterministic & the other was discrete/probabilistic!)
What if, someone had done research & mathematically showed/proved that, collective/average behavior of water molecules (when viewed/analyzed from macro-scale point-of-view), re-created well-known Navier-Stokes equations/physics!

(202109153) Commented on the article:

"What Does Einstein's General Relativity Actually Mean?"
https://www.patreon.com/posts/what-does-mean-56178993

Just some food for thought:

Let's consider/realize that how common are fluids in our physical reality/universe!
& if we want to unite General Relativity & Quantum Mechanics & if we already know that equations of GR can be converted to fluid equations, would it really still make sense that we insist on using GR equations that model spacetime as an elastic continuous geometric structure?
Wouldn't it really make more sense that if we assume spacetime is a fluid & start looking for finding-out what & how could create it?

From Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_solution
"In general relativity, a fluid solution is an exact solution of the Einstein field equation in which the gravitational field is produced entirely by the mass, momentum, and stress density of a fluid."

Also realize that all physical fluids have a physical situation, just like QM & GR we want to unite:
They are discrete/probabilistic at micro-scale & continuous/deterministic at macro-scale!

(202109164) Commented on the article:

"Are We Approaching Quantum Gravity All Wrong?"
https://www.patreon.com/posts/are-we-quantum-56221113

Imagine that if we were living underwater & we had 2 main physics theories:
1: A discrete/probabilistic theory at micro-scale describing mechanics/dynamics of individual water molecules!
2: A continuous/deterministic theory at macro-scale describing mechanics/dynamics of water!
What if most people thought that those 2 theories are incompatible/contradictory?
How we could prove those people wrong (& unite our 2 theories)?
What if we mathematically derived the macro-scale theory from the micro-scale theory?
Imagine, starting w/ modeling few water molecules at first (using the micro-scale theory) & later showing that, as number of water molecules goes to infinity, collective/average mechanics/dynamics gives us the equations of the macro-scale theory!